|
|
Correction
of exercises
a) Profit from this example to
come back to the notion of a small risk (-1pt) in a competitive
situation. Check that all your pupils have accurately counted 24 DH points
in the side: so they are one point short to bid 3
over 2 , and
the over-bid is automatic whatever the vulnerability. On the other hand,
they are three points short to bid 4:
that is not allowed whatever the vulnerability
(advice 19.1).
b) This time with 23 DH points in the two hands, it is obvious to over-bid
to 2
… and normal to overbid to 3
not vulnerable ("medium" risk). Show that on most occasions you would
need to do it: being vulnerable the opponents will most often only have
23 DH points in their hands and will not have the means to over-bid to
3.
Comprehension
questions
| a) |
Not vulnerable, how many tricks can
you afford to fail by, if he opponents would make a part game contract?
|
| b) |
Same question, if vulnerable? |
| c) |
What is a small medium risk? [?!]
|
|
